Investigators
55 investigators with at least 10 community-logged games. Click any investigator name for a personal dossier.
How concentrated is investigator play?
Investigator play concentration
How much of the community's play is concentrated on a few favorites. Walk left-to-right and you see how many games are accounted for by the top N most-played investigators — a steep curve means a small clique dominates; a gentle one means healthy variety. Faint bars in the background show each individual investigator's share.
Win rate of the 25 most-played investigators
Win rates with a range of uncertainty shown as whiskers. Investigators stay in popularity order (most-played at top) rather than win-rate order — so you can see at a glance whether the community's favorites actually perform.
Bodyguards & Glass Cannons
Modern = standardized to modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). The with/without comparison is recomputed within comparable conditions. How this works →
Effect on winning vs. effect on casualties
Each dot is an investigator. Across the bottom: how much teams' win rate changes when this investigator is on the squad (right = wins more). Up the side: how casualties change (up = team takes more hits). Four quadrants: Bodyguard (wins, keeps people alive), Carry (wins, but at a cost), Glass Cannon (loses, but safer), Liability (worse on both fronts).
Synergy
Modern = standardized to modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). Switches the forests and the network below. Most pooled pair 'synergy' is a ruleset artifact and collapses toward 1.0× under modern conditions. How this works →
Top pair synergies
The number is how much better the pair does together than apart — 1.20× means they win 20% more often as a duo. Bars whose whiskers stay entirely past the dashed 1.0× line are real chemistry; tan bars could just be noise.
Bottom pair anti-synergies
The opposite end: pairs that win less together than each one does on their own. Bars whose whiskers stay entirely below the 1.0× line are confidently bad chemistry; tan bars could just be noise.
Co-play network
Each circle is an investigator — bigger circle = played more, color shows how their win rate stacks up against the 60% community average (cream is on pace, red lags, green leads). Lines connect pairs with notable team chemistry: solid red = they're stronger together, dashed blue = they drag each other down. Dimmed circles have no notable pair signal. Drag, pan, and zoom to explore.
Rumors
Rumor frequency vs. difficulty
Each dot is a rumor card. Across the bottom: how often it shows up in logged games. Up the side: how often the community passes it. Color follows pass rate (red = often failed, green = usually passed). Top-right = common and easy (routine). Bottom-right = common and hard (frequent obstacle). Bottom-left = rare and hard (boss-tier). Top-left = rare and easy. We label the four most common plus the four hardest.
Modern = rumor pass rate restricted to modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). Note the top-20 here are ranked by the all-time rate. How this works →
Rumor success rate per investigator
How often rumors get passed in games featuring each investigator — the 20 with the highest pass rate. Take this with a grain of salt: it's about who was at the table, not who actually solved the rumor — see the methodology for caveats.
Consistency vs. volatility
Modern = swing recomputed from each investigator's per-Ancient-One win rates within modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). Core investigators look steadier once their brutal base-only games drop out. How this works →
Steady hands vs. boom-or-bust
Each dot is one investigator. Across the bottom: how much their win rate jumps around across the Ancient Ones they've faced (left = steady-Eddie, right = swingy). Up the side: total games (just so the dots don't pile up). Color tracks the same swing (cool = reliable, warm = volatile). We label the three steadiest and the three swingiest to keep the chart readable.
The full roster
All investigators
Sorted by total games played. Click any name for the per-investigator dossier.
| Investigator | Games | Win rate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie | 4,899 | 61.3% | [60%, 63%] |
| Lily | 4,787 | 54.5% | [53%, 56%] |
| Jacqueline | 4,497 | 62.2% | [61%, 64%] |
| Diana | 4,225 | 54.4% | [53%, 56%] |
| Trish | 3,908 | 53.7% | [52%, 55%] |
| Akachi | 3,881 | 53.5% | [52%, 55%] |
| Leo | 3,666 | 51.8% | [50%, 53%] |
| Norman | 3,405 | 54.1% | [52%, 56%] |
| Silas | 3,383 | 51.7% | [50%, 53%] |
| Jim | 3,245 | 54.3% | [53%, 56%] |
| Mark | 3,187 | 48.4% | [47%, 50%] |
| Lola | 2,858 | 54.1% | [52%, 56%] |
| Ursula | 2,691 | 67.7% | [66%, 69%] |
| Daisy | 2,389 | 67.2% | [65%, 69%] |
| Agnes | 2,148 | 61.3% | [59%, 63%] |
| Skids | 2,077 | 63.2% | [61%, 65%] |
| Zoey | 1,958 | 58.3% | [56%, 60%] |
| Jenny | 1,816 | 69.0% | [67%, 71%] |
| Patrice | 1,640 | 61.2% | [59%, 64%] |
| Monterey | 1,580 | 64.0% | [62%, 66%] |
| Marie | 1,514 | 62.7% | [60%, 65%] |
| Tommy | 1,501 | 59.8% | [57%, 62%] |
| Wilson | 1,406 | 58.4% | [56%, 61%] |
| Mary | 1,405 | 68.3% | [66%, 71%] |
| Dexter | 1,385 | 62.8% | [60%, 65%] |
| George | 1,346 | 62.3% | [60%, 65%] |
| Mandy | 1,333 | 64.1% | [62%, 67%] |
| Luke | 1,331 | 72.0% | [70%, 74%] |
| Minh | 1,311 | 68.3% | [66%, 71%] |
| Finn | 1,281 | 55.7% | [53%, 58%] |
| Hank | 1,255 | 57.5% | [55%, 60%] |
| Wendy | 1,223 | 65.1% | [62%, 68%] |
| Tony | 1,216 | 55.2% | [52%, 58%] |
| Rex | 1,162 | 67.1% | [64%, 70%] |
| Pete | 1,139 | 70.4% | [68%, 73%] |
| Bob | 1,050 | 67.9% | [65%, 71%] |
| Kate | 1,044 | 65.7% | [63%, 69%] |
| Michael | 1,041 | 61.6% | [59%, 64%] |
| Joe | 1,035 | 59.8% | [57%, 63%] |
| Agatha | 975 | 73.2% | [70%, 76%] |
| Rita | 913 | 62.6% | [59%, 66%] |
| William | 908 | 63.3% | [60%, 66%] |
| Harvey | 877 | 61.5% | [58%, 65%] |
| Roland | 849 | 67.4% | [64%, 70%] |
| Daniela | 772 | 68.7% | [65%, 72%] |
| Gloria | 770 | 66.4% | [63%, 70%] |
| Mateo | 746 | 66.3% | [63%, 70%] |
| Carolyn | 735 | 66.4% | [63%, 70%] |
| Preston | 731 | 69.9% | [66%, 73%] |
| Darrell | 665 | 64.1% | [60%, 68%] |
| Sefina | 652 | 70.7% | [67%, 74%] |
| Vincent | 637 | 63.1% | [59%, 67%] |
| Calvin | 603 | 62.8% | [59%, 67%] |
| Amanda | 592 | 63.0% | [59%, 67%] |
| Carson | 530 | 70.0% | [66%, 74%] |