← All contributors

blizzard

Overview

299
Games logged
191 won, 108 lost.
63.9%
Personal win rate
+3.8 pts vs community (60.1%).
1,578
Days active
69.2 games / year on average.
Silas
Favorite investigator
Most-played character.
11
Longest win streak
Consecutive victories in a row.
4
Longest loss streak
Consecutive defeats in a row.

Career arc

Dec 19, 2013
first game
Apr 15, 2018
last game

Wins vs losses

A quick visual tally of this contributor's career so far.

N= 299

Best & worst Ancient One (n ≥ 5)

  • Best Hypnos — 100.0% (n=6)
  • Personal nemesis Syzygy — 44.4% (n=36)
  • Unique AOs faced 16

Net record

+83
191 victories minus 108 defeats. Ahead of the 50/50 line by 13.9 pts.

Ancient Ones

Above or below the curve

For each Ancient One this contributor has faced at least 5 times, the gap between their personal win rate and how the community does against the same foe. Green bars = they beat the community average; red bars = they trail it.

N= 293

Most-faced Ancient Ones

Where this contributor spends their time, split into wins and losses. Bar length is total games against each foe; the green share is how often they won. Sorted by games played.

N= 299

Win rate with confidence range

Same per-AO win rate, but with a 95% confidence band based on sample size. Wide bars = few games (treat with caution). Narrow bars = many games. Only AOs with 2+ games shown.

N= 299

Personal vs community win rate

Each Ancient One the contributor has fought multiple times. Across the bottom: the community's win rate against that foe; up the side: this contributor's own. Color marks the gap — green where they beat the community against that foe, red where they trail it. Dot size shows how many games they've logged against it.

N= 297

Where they sit among peers

Rank against every other contributor with at least 5 games logged. Higher is better.

N= 714
61%ile

Above the median — outperforms 61% of the cohort.

Repertoire breadth

An effective count of how many Ancient Ones make up this contributor's career — accounts for how lopsided their distribution is. Close to the unique-AO count = broad variety. Close to 1 = one or two favourites dominate.

11.1eff. AOs

Career is spread across many Ancient Ones. Top foe: Cthulhu (14% of all games). 16 unique AOs ever faced.

Toughest AOs they've beaten

Ancient Ones where the community loses at least 55% of the time — and this contributor has carved out at least one win.

N= 41
Ancient One Community loss % Personal wins Personal win %
Cthulhu 56% 21 / 41 51.2%

All Ancient Ones faced

Click a column header to sort.

N= 299
Ancient One Games Wins Win %
Cthulhu 41 21 51.2%
Yig 36 19 52.8%
Syzygy 36 16 44.4%
Shub-Niggurath 31 20 64.5%
Yog-Sothoth 30 21 70.0%
Azathoth 27 18 66.7%
Rise of the Elder Things 17 15 88.2%
Ithaqua 16 14 87.5%
Hastur 15 8 53.3%
Shudde M'ell 10 8 80.0%
Abhoth 10 8 80.0%
Atlach-Nacha 9 4 44.4%
Nephren-Ka 9 8 88.9%
Hypnos 6 6 100.0%
Antediluvium 4 3 75.0%
Nyarlathotep 2 2 100.0%

Investigators

Most-played investigators

Where this contributor spends their time on the roster. Sorted by total games with each character.

N= 661

Win rate by investigator

Per-character win rate with a 95% confidence band. Only investigators played 3+ times appear; wide bars mean a small sample.

N= 358

Roster breadth

An effective count of how many investigators make up this contributor's career — it accounts for how lopsided their picks are. Close to the unique count means wide variety; close to 1 means a couple of mains dominate.

27.9eff. chars

Most-played: Silas (6% of all games). 55 unique investigators ever fielded.

Expansions

Boxes in play

How often each expansion is on the table in this contributor's games. A single game usually mixes several boxes, so the totals overlap.

N= 263

Expansions mixed per game

How many expansion boxes this contributor typically combines in a single game.

N= 299

Win rate by expansion

Win rate in games featuring each box (95% band). Boxes played 5+ times only — this reflects which boxes they tend to win with, not the box's own difficulty.

N= 861

Time & Activity

Time at the table

Across 266 timed games. Game length is self-reported; the rare sub-30-minute entries (data slips) are excluded.

N= 266
307h
Roughly 306h 31m spent summoning horrors. Averaging 69 min per game (−102 min vs the community's 171 min).

Game-length distribution

How long this contributor's games run, in minutes. The visible range clips a few long outliers.

N= 266

Quick wins or long grinds?

2min
Their victories average 68 min and defeats 71 min — they tend to close out the faster games.

Win rate by team size

Does this contributor do better solo or in a full party? Win rate against the number of investigators at the table, with a 95% confidence band. Only team sizes with 3+ games shown.

N= 297

Games per year

This contributor's logged games by calendar year — the seasons when they were most active.

N= 299

Win-rate trajectory

A rolling win rate across their career in game order — is their form trending up or down? The dashed line marks the community average.

N= 299

When they play

Every logged game on a day × hour grid (UTC). Darker cells are busier slots. The strip on top totals games by hour of day; the strip on the right totals them by weekday. Hover any cell for win rate and average length.

N= 299

Records

Trophy case

Career bests and lifetime tallies.

31m
Fastest victory
3h 15m
Longest game
8
Biggest team
365
Monsters defeated
52
Investigators lost

How their games end

The split of victory types (green) and defeat causes (red) across this contributor's games.

N= 299

Outcome mix vs community

For each way a game can end, the gap between this contributor's share and the community's. Bars to the right = it happens to them more often than the average player.

N= 299