← All contributors

Tacosupreme

Overview

79
Games logged
49 won, 30 lost.
62.0%
Personal win rate
+1.9 pts vs community (60.1%).
1,545
Days active
18.7 games / year on average.
William
Favorite investigator
Most-played character.
8
Longest win streak
Consecutive victories in a row.
3
Longest loss streak
Consecutive defeats in a row.

Career arc

Nov 4, 2015
first game
Jan 26, 2020
last game

Wins vs losses

A quick visual tally of this contributor's career so far.

N= 79

Best & worst Ancient One (n ≥ 5)

  • Best Atlach-Nacha — 100.0% (n=5)
  • Personal nemesis Syzygy — 28.6% (n=7)
  • Unique AOs faced 16

Net record

+19
49 victories minus 30 defeats. Ahead of the 50/50 line by 12.0 pts.

Ancient Ones

Above or below the curve

For each Ancient One this contributor has faced at least 5 times, the gap between their personal win rate and how the community does against the same foe. Green bars = they beat the community average; red bars = they trail it.

N= 65

Most-faced Ancient Ones

Where this contributor spends their time, split into wins and losses. Bar length is total games against each foe; the green share is how often they won. Sorted by games played.

N= 79

Win rate with confidence range

Same per-AO win rate, but with a 95% confidence band based on sample size. Wide bars = few games (treat with caution). Narrow bars = many games. Only AOs with 2+ games shown.

N= 79

Personal vs community win rate

Each Ancient One the contributor has fought multiple times. Across the bottom: the community's win rate against that foe; up the side: this contributor's own. Color marks the gap — green where they beat the community against that foe, red where they trail it. Dot size shows how many games they've logged against it.

N= 75

Where they sit among peers

Rank against every other contributor with at least 5 games logged. Higher is better.

N= 716
57%ile

Above the median — outperforms 57% of the cohort.

Repertoire breadth

An effective count of how many Ancient Ones make up this contributor's career — accounts for how lopsided their distribution is. Close to the unique-AO count = broad variety. Close to 1 = one or two favourites dominate.

14.4eff. AOs

Career is spread across many Ancient Ones. Top foe: Abhoth (9% of all games). 16 unique AOs ever faced.

Toughest AOs they've beaten

Ancient Ones where the community loses at least 55% of the time — and this contributor has carved out at least one win.

N= 4
Ancient One Community loss % Personal wins Personal win %
Cthulhu 56% 1 / 4 25.0%

All Ancient Ones faced

Click a column header to sort.

N= 79
Ancient One Games Wins Win %
Abhoth 7 6 85.7%
Shub-Niggurath 7 4 57.1%
Syzygy 7 2 28.6%
Azathoth 6 5 83.3%
Nyarlathotep 6 4 66.7%
Yig 6 2 33.3%
Hypnos 6 5 83.3%
Atlach-Nacha 5 5 100.0%
Rise of the Elder Things 5 4 80.0%
Nephren-Ka 5 2 40.0%
Shudde M'ell 5 3 60.0%
Cthulhu 4 1 25.0%
Ithaqua 3 2 66.7%
Yog-Sothoth 3 1 33.3%
Hastur 2 1 50.0%
Antediluvium 2 2 100.0%

Investigators

Most-played investigators

Where this contributor spends their time on the roster. Sorted by total games with each character.

N= 216

Win rate by investigator

Per-character win rate with a 95% confidence band. Only investigators played 3+ times appear; wide bars mean a small sample.

N= 164

Roster breadth

An effective count of how many investigators make up this contributor's career — it accounts for how lopsided their picks are. Close to the unique count means wide variety; close to 1 means a couple of mains dominate.

41.1eff. chars

Most-played: William (5% of all games). 55 unique investigators ever fielded.

Expansions

Boxes in play

How often each expansion is on the table in this contributor's games. A single game usually mixes several boxes, so the totals overlap.

N= 78

Expansions mixed per game

How many expansion boxes this contributor typically combines in a single game.

N= 79

Win rate by expansion

Win rate in games featuring each box (95% band). Boxes played 5+ times only — this reflects which boxes they tend to win with, not the box's own difficulty.

N= 575

Time & Activity

Time at the table

Across 51 timed games. Game length is self-reported; the rare sub-30-minute entries (data slips) are excluded.

N= 51
126h
Roughly 125h 40m spent summoning horrors. Averaging 148 min per game (−23 min vs the community's 171 min).

Game-length distribution

How long this contributor's games run, in minutes. The visible range clips a few long outliers.

N= 51

Quick wins or long grinds?

6min
Their victories average 146 min and defeats 152 min — they tend to close out the faster games.

Win rate by team size

Does this contributor do better solo or in a full party? Win rate against the number of investigators at the table, with a 95% confidence band. Only team sizes with 3+ games shown.

N= 78

Games per year

This contributor's logged games by calendar year — the seasons when they were most active.

N= 79

Win-rate trajectory

A rolling win rate across their career in game order — is their form trending up or down? The dashed line marks the community average.

N= 79

When they play

Every logged game on a day × hour grid (UTC). Darker cells are busier slots. The strip on top totals games by hour of day; the strip on the right totals them by weekday. Hover any cell for win rate and average length.

N= 79

Records

Trophy case

Career bests and lifetime tallies.

26
Best score
30m
Fastest victory
6h 40m
Longest game
4
Biggest team
167
Monsters defeated
33
Investigators lost

How their games end

The split of victory types (green) and defeat causes (red) across this contributor's games.

N= 79

Outcome mix vs community

For each way a game can end, the gap between this contributor's share and the community's. Bars to the right = it happens to them more often than the average player.

N= 79