Investigators
55 investigators with at least 10 community-logged games. Click any investigator name for a personal dossier.
How concentrated is investigator play?
Investigator play concentration
How much of the community's play is concentrated on a few favorites. Walk left-to-right and you see how many games are accounted for by the top N most-played investigators — a steep curve means a small clique dominates; a gentle one means healthy variety. Faint bars in the background show each individual investigator's share.
Win rate of the 25 most-played investigators
Win rates with a range of uncertainty shown as whiskers. Investigators stay in popularity order (most-played at top) rather than win-rate order — so you can see at a glance whether the community's favorites actually perform.
Bodyguards & Glass Cannons
Modern = standardized to modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). The with/without comparison is recomputed within comparable conditions. How this works →
Effect on winning vs. effect on casualties
Each dot is an investigator. Across the bottom: how much teams' win rate changes when this investigator is on the squad (right = wins more). Up the side: how casualties change (up = team takes more hits). Four quadrants: Bodyguard (wins, keeps people alive), Carry (wins, but at a cost), Glass Cannon (loses, but safer), Liability (worse on both fronts).
Synergy
Modern = standardized to modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). Switches the forests and the network below. Most pooled pair 'synergy' is a ruleset artifact and collapses toward 1.0× under modern conditions. How this works →
Top pair synergies
The number is how much better the pair does together than apart — 1.20× means they win 20% more often as a duo. Bars whose whiskers stay entirely past the dashed 1.0× line are real chemistry; tan bars could just be noise.
Bottom pair anti-synergies
The opposite end: pairs that win less together than each one does on their own. Bars whose whiskers stay entirely below the 1.0× line are confidently bad chemistry; tan bars could just be noise.
Co-play network
Each circle is an investigator — bigger circle = played more, color shows how their win rate stacks up against the 60% community average (cream is on pace, red lags, green leads). Lines connect pairs with notable team chemistry: solid red = they're stronger together, dashed blue = they drag each other down. Dimmed circles have no notable pair signal. Drag, pan, and zoom to explore.
Rumors
Rumor frequency vs. difficulty
Each dot is a rumor card. Across the bottom: how often it shows up in logged games. Up the side: how often the community passes it. Color follows pass rate (red = often failed, green = usually passed). Top-right = common and easy (routine). Bottom-right = common and hard (frequent obstacle). Bottom-left = rare and hard (boss-tier). Top-left = rare and easy. We label the four most common plus the four hardest.
Modern = rumor pass rate restricted to modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). Note the top-20 here are ranked by the all-time rate. How this works →
Rumor success rate per investigator
How often rumors get passed in games featuring each investigator — the 20 with the highest pass rate. Take this with a grain of salt: it's about who was at the table, not who actually solved the rumor — see the methodology for caveats.
Consistency vs. volatility
Modern = swing recomputed from each investigator's per-Ancient-One win rates within modern expansion-table play (big-box games, 2018+). Core investigators look steadier once their brutal base-only games drop out. How this works →
Steady hands vs. boom-or-bust
Each dot is one investigator. Across the bottom: how much their win rate jumps around across the Ancient Ones they've faced (left = steady-Eddie, right = swingy). Up the side: total games (just so the dots don't pile up). Color tracks the same swing (cool = reliable, warm = volatile). We label the three steadiest and the three swingiest to keep the chart readable.
The full roster
All investigators
Sorted by total games played. Click any name for the per-investigator dossier.
| Investigator | Games | Win rate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie | 4,872 | 61.2% | [60%, 63%] |
| Lily | 4,759 | 54.5% | [53%, 56%] |
| Jacqueline | 4,457 | 62.1% | [61%, 64%] |
| Diana | 4,199 | 54.5% | [53%, 56%] |
| Trish | 3,864 | 53.6% | [52%, 55%] |
| Akachi | 3,856 | 53.4% | [52%, 55%] |
| Leo | 3,637 | 51.7% | [50%, 53%] |
| Norman | 3,376 | 53.9% | [52%, 56%] |
| Silas | 3,372 | 51.8% | [50%, 53%] |
| Jim | 3,229 | 54.4% | [53%, 56%] |
| Mark | 3,164 | 48.4% | [47%, 50%] |
| Lola | 2,840 | 54.2% | [52%, 56%] |
| Ursula | 2,648 | 67.8% | [66%, 70%] |
| Daisy | 2,360 | 67.1% | [65%, 69%] |
| Agnes | 2,129 | 61.2% | [59%, 63%] |
| "Skids" | 2,038 | 63.2% | [61%, 65%] |
| Zoey | 1,936 | 58.3% | [56%, 60%] |
| Jenny | 1,789 | 68.8% | [67%, 71%] |
| Patrice | 1,617 | 61.4% | [59%, 64%] |
| Monterey | 1,556 | 64.2% | [62%, 67%] |
| Marie | 1,489 | 62.5% | [60%, 65%] |
| Tommy | 1,480 | 59.9% | [57%, 62%] |
| Wilson | 1,395 | 58.4% | [56%, 61%] |
| Mary | 1,384 | 68.5% | [66%, 71%] |
| Dexter | 1,367 | 62.8% | [60%, 65%] |
| George | 1,330 | 62.3% | [60%, 65%] |
| Mandy | 1,306 | 64.2% | [62%, 67%] |
| Luke | 1,302 | 71.9% | [69%, 74%] |
| Minh | 1,287 | 68.4% | [66%, 71%] |
| Finn | 1,265 | 55.9% | [53%, 59%] |
| Hank | 1,235 | 57.6% | [55%, 60%] |
| Tony | 1,204 | 55.2% | [52%, 58%] |
| Wendy | 1,204 | 65.0% | [62%, 68%] |
| Rex | 1,133 | 67.0% | [64%, 70%] |
| Pete | 1,117 | 70.3% | [68%, 73%] |
| Bob | 1,031 | 68.0% | [65%, 71%] |
| Michael | 1,028 | 61.8% | [59%, 65%] |
| Kate | 1,027 | 65.9% | [63%, 69%] |
| Joe | 1,021 | 59.7% | [57%, 63%] |
| Agatha | 955 | 73.2% | [70%, 76%] |
| William | 892 | 63.2% | [60%, 66%] |
| Rita | 891 | 62.6% | [59%, 66%] |
| Harvey | 868 | 61.6% | [58%, 65%] |
| Roland | 831 | 67.6% | [64%, 71%] |
| Daniela | 761 | 69.1% | [66%, 72%] |
| Gloria | 755 | 66.5% | [63%, 70%] |
| Mateo | 734 | 66.3% | [63%, 70%] |
| Carolyn | 720 | 66.5% | [63%, 70%] |
| Preston | 706 | 69.7% | [66%, 73%] |
| Darrell | 655 | 64.3% | [61%, 68%] |
| Sefina | 641 | 70.8% | [67%, 74%] |
| Vincent | 622 | 63.7% | [60%, 67%] |
| Calvin | 597 | 62.8% | [59%, 67%] |
| Amanda | 566 | 61.7% | [58%, 66%] |
| Carson | 517 | 69.8% | [66%, 74%] |